Latest action: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Failed by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 198 - 218 (Roll no. 221).
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Sponsor
Eric Crawford (R-AR)
Filed in the House.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Extends government powers to collect foreign intelligence on Americans' communications.
The problem
Title VII of FISA authorities were set to expire. Congress needed to decide whether to renew surveillance powers used for national security.
The proposal
Bill extends Title VII authorities of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, allowing continued surveillance programs under existing legal framework.
The impact
Affects Americans' privacy rights, national security operations, technology companies handling data, and intelligence agencies conducting foreign surveillance activities.
Allows intelligence agencies to monitor foreign threats and prevent terrorism. Supporters argue these tools are essential for protecting Americans from hostile foreign governments and extremist organizations.
Uses existing FISA court oversight processes rather than creating new unchecked powers. Maintains procedural safeguards that have been in place since 2008.
Continuing authority prevents operational disruptions to ongoing counterintelligence work. Gaps in surveillance powers could allow foreign intelligence operations to proceed undetected.
Maintains intelligence capabilities needed to counter foreign espionage and protect national interests in global competition.
Extends powers to monitor Americans' communications and data. Critics worry surveillance can be misused against political opponents, journalists, or activists without strong safeguards.
FISA court approves surveillance requests with minimal public transparency. Secret government surveillance makes it hard for citizens to know if their rights are being violated.
Historical instances show intelligence agencies have sometimes misused surveillance powers. Extension continues programs that can target Americans based on weak connections to foreign contacts.
Bill failed passage (198-218), indicating significant congressional opposition. Suggests lawmakers question whether extension adequately protects American privacy rights.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 7683
VA Fiscal Management Modernization Act
HR 6698
Board of Veterans Appeals Annual Report Transparency Act of 2025
HR 7260
National Cemetery Administration Annual Report Act of 2026
HR 2283
Recognizing Community Organizations for Veteran Engagement and Recovery Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.