Latest action: Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 45 - 1.
Committee has approved the bill (usually with amendments) and sent it back to the full chamber.
The committee voted to send the bill to the floor of the full chamber. The Speaker of the House schedules a floor vote.
Next: Passed One Chamber
The other chamber (Senate or House) repeats the committee + floor-vote process
Creates enforcement measures for stolen property recovered from humanitarian crisis situations.
The problem
Valuable items are stolen during humanitarian crises and international disasters. Current laws lack specific enforcement procedures for recovering and returning this stolen property to rightful owners.
The proposal
Establishes legal procedures and enforcement mechanisms for identifying, recovering, and returning stolen property seized during humanitarian emergencies. Creates coordination between U.S. agencies and international partners.
The impact
Affects theft victims in crisis zones, humanitarian organizations, law enforcement agencies, and international governments involved in disaster response and property recovery efforts.
Helps people who lost possessions during crises recover their stolen items. Provides legal framework ensuring stolen goods are returned to rightful owners rather than kept or sold illegally.
Gives relief organizations clearer legal backing when they encounter stolen property during aid operations. Reduces confusion about handling recovered items and improves coordination with authorities.
Creates formal processes for U.S. agencies to work with other countries on property recovery. Builds relationships and trust between nations responding to shared humanitarian challenges.
Clear enforcement procedures may discourage looters and thieves from stealing during emergencies. Stronger consequences increase risk for criminals targeting vulnerable disaster areas.
Implementing new enforcement procedures requires government funding and personnel training. Resources spent on this could be redirected to other international aid programs or domestic needs.
In crisis situations, documentation may be lost or unclear, making it difficult to prove who owns recovered items. Could create disputes between claimants and delay returning property.
Law enforcement capacity is often limited in disaster zones. International enforcement may be difficult without strong government presence or cooperation in affected countries.
Recovered stolen property requires secure storage, inventory management, and transportation. These practical challenges could overwhelm resources in crisis situations.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10748
Balkans Security Cooperation Act
SRES 939
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate that it values the active participation of the Republic of Kosovo as the state partner of the Iowa National Guard over the past 15 years.
HR 1744
United States Commission on International Religious Freedom Reauthorization Act of 2026
HCONRES 89
Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.