Latest action: Received in the Senate.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Sponsor
Glenn Thompson (R-PA)
Filed in the House.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
A bill to strengthen U.S. farm production and food security through agriculture and food policy changes.
The problem
The U.S. faces potential vulnerabilities in food supply chains, agricultural productivity, and national food security amid global uncertainties.
The proposal
The bill likely modifies farm programs, food production systems, and agricultural policies to boost domestic food production and supply resilience.
The impact
Farmers, food producers, consumers, rural communities, and food security agencies experience changes in agricultural support and food system operations.
Increased domestic food production reduces reliance on imports. This protects against supply disruptions and trade disputes. The U.S. becomes more self-sufficient.
Agricultural programs may provide financial assistance or incentives to farmers. This helps rural economies and encourages farming as a profession.
Strengthening food production capacity protects against future crises. Better supply chains mean more stable food availability for Americans.
Agricultural investment creates jobs in farming, processing, and distribution. Rural areas gain economic activity and employment opportunities.
Farm subsidies and agricultural programs require government spending. Taxpayers fund these initiatives, potentially increasing federal budget deficits.
Increased production may pressure land use and natural resources. Agricultural expansion could affect soil health, water, or ecosystems.
Government support for domestic production may increase food prices. Subsidies can unfairly compete with international farmers or smaller producers.
Without knowing specific provisions, program effectiveness is uncertain. Bureaucratic complexity could slow benefits to farmers or consumers.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10157
Freedom to Home Distill Act
S 5301
Voice for Farm Workers Act
S 5303
Supporting Our Farm and Food System Workforce Act
HR 10058
Summer Meals and Learning Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.