Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Proposes eliminating federal income taxes on overtime pay for all workers.
The problem
Workers who earn overtime pay face higher tax rates on extra hours worked, reducing take-home income from additional labor.
The proposal
Bill would exclude overtime compensation from federal income taxation, allowing workers to keep all earnings from hours beyond standard workweek.
The impact
Affects all workers who earn overtime pay. Reduces federal tax revenue. Changes after-tax income for affected employees and labor costs for employers.
Workers would keep all overtime earnings without federal taxes. This rewards people working extra hours and increases their actual income. Particularly helps lower and middle-income workers.
Removing taxes on overtime may incentivize employees to work additional hours. Higher net pay for extra work could boost labor supply and productivity.
Eliminates need to track and tax overtime separately. Could reduce administrative complexity for workers and employers managing payroll.
Helps households relying on overtime income to meet expenses. Benefits workers in hourly positions and manual labor industries.
Eliminating federal taxes on overtime would significantly reduce government tax collections. This lost revenue could require spending cuts or tax increases elsewhere.
Only benefits hourly workers earning overtime. Salaried employees cannot receive overtime pay under federal law, creating unequal tax treatment.
Companies may face higher labor costs if employees work more overtime for higher net pay. Could reduce hiring or cut other benefits.
High earners working overtime benefit more in absolute dollars than lower earners. May increase wealth inequality between different income groups.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10730
Healthy Communities Act of 2026
HR 5349
TAS Act
HR 9496
End Tax Penalties on American Hostages Act
HR 997
National Taxpayer Advocate Enhancement Act of 2025
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.