Latest action: Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 270.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Sponsor
Pat Fallon (R-TX)
Filed in the House.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Changes how Washington D.C. chooses its top lawyer.
The problem
Currently, D.C.'s attorney general is appointed by the mayor. This bill addresses how that appointment process works and D.C.'s governance structure.
The proposal
The bill modifies the appointment process for D.C.'s attorney general, likely changing who appoints or confirms this position from current procedures.
The impact
Affects D.C. government operations, the attorney general's office, and how D.C. residents' top legal representative is selected and overseen.
Changing the appointment process could make the attorney general more accountable to elected representatives or voters rather than just the mayor. This may ensure better oversight of the attorney general's decisions.
Reforming how this official is chosen might give D.C. residents more voice in the process. A different selection method could align better with democratic principles.
The reform could make D.C.'s government structure more transparent and easier for residents to understand. Better-defined procedures may reduce confusion about authority and responsibilities.
A new appointment process might involve more political actors, potentially leading to delays or disputes. Different groups might disagree on who should be attorney general.
Changing how the attorney general is chosen mid-term could create uncertainty in the office. Staff and ongoing cases might face instability during transition periods.
If Congress gains more control over D.C. appointments, it raises questions about local self-governance. D.C. residents may have less say in their own government choices.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10764
Executive Settlement Review Act
HR 8352
Criminal History Access Act of 2026
S 32
LACA
HR 10389
Survivor’s Voice Protection Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.