Latest action: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Prevent Iran from using advanced Western technology to build military drones.
The problem
Iran may be acquiring transatlantic technology to develop and improve drone capabilities that could threaten regional security and U.S. interests.
The proposal
The bill blocks transfer of technology between Western countries if it could end up in Iranian-made drones or military programs.
The impact
Tech companies, defense contractors, and U.S.-allied nations face new export restrictions; Iran's drone development may be slowed.
Blocking access to advanced Western technology could slow Iran's ability to build more sophisticated drones. This may reduce threats to U.S. military personnel and regional allies. Stronger restrictions make it harder for Iran to develop weapons.
The bill encourages the U.S. and allied nations to work together on tech export rules. Coordinated international restrictions are more effective than one country acting alone. This improves shared security efforts.
Preventing critical defense technology from reaching hostile nations helps protect U.S. military interests. It reduces the risk of advanced weapons being used against American forces or partners.
Clear rules against tech transfers may discourage other countries from helping Iran. This sends a message that supplying hostile nations has consequences.
Tech and manufacturing companies may lose overseas sales and profits if exports are restricted. Companies could face higher compliance costs to ensure their products don't reach Iran indirectly. This could reduce competitiveness in global markets.
Strict rules might upset allied nations that want to trade certain technologies. These countries may feel the U.S. is imposing its own foreign policy on them. It could create tension in important partnerships.
Iran can potentially acquire technology through unofficial channels, third-party countries, or black markets. Enforcement relies on other nations following the same rules, which is difficult to guarantee. The bill may have limited real-world effectiveness.
The bill may be unclear about exactly which technologies are covered, creating confusion for businesses. Companies might avoid selling any advanced products to avoid accidental violations. This could be overly broad and restrictive.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10748
Balkans Security Cooperation Act
SRES 939
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate that it values the active participation of the Republic of Kosovo as the state partner of the Iowa National Guard over the past 15 years.
HR 1744
United States Commission on International Religious Freedom Reauthorization Act of 2026
HCONRES 89
Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.