Latest action: Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Transfer Adak Island land from Interior to Navy control.
The problem
Adak Island, Alaska has land managed by Interior Department that Navy needs for military purposes. Current administrative structure may not support defense operations efficiently.
The proposal
Secretary of Interior transfers administrative control of specified Adak Island lands to Secretary of Navy for military use and management.
The impact
Navy gains land management authority on Adak. Local stakeholders and Interior Department operations affected. Potential changes to island's civilian and military activities.
Navy can manage defense facilities more efficiently without coordinating across two agencies. Faster decision-making for national security needs on the island.
Strengthens U.S. military positioning in Arctic and Pacific regions. Adak's location makes it valuable for defense operations and monitoring.
Single agency control eliminates coordination delays between Interior and Defense departments. Simplifies land management and operational decisions.
Interior manages lands for multiple uses including conservation and recreation. Transfer to Navy could restrict public access and civilian activities on transferred land.
Military operations may conflict with environmental protection and wildlife management. Navy priorities might not align with conservation goals Interior previously maintained.
Bill lacks details on which lands transfer and what happens to existing programs. Uncertainty could disrupt current activities and local stakeholders.
No mention of community consultation or public review process. Adak residents and stakeholders may not have voice in transfer decision.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 7683
VA Fiscal Management Modernization Act
HR 6698
Board of Veterans Appeals Annual Report Transparency Act of 2025
HR 7260
National Cemetery Administration Annual Report Act of 2026
HR 2283
Recognizing Community Organizations for Veteran Engagement and Recovery Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.