Latest action: Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committees on Energy and Commerce, and Education and Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill addresses college athlete compensation and eligibility rules in sports.
The problem
College athletes currently have limited ability to earn money from their name, image, and likeness. Rules vary by state and school, creating confusion and inequality.
The proposal
Establishes federal standards for college athlete compensation, eligibility, and transfer rules. Creates consistent national rules rather than different state rules.
The impact
College athletes, universities, state governments, and sports organizations face new federal requirements affecting compensation, recruiting, and student eligibility across all schools.
College athletes work hard and generate money for schools. This bill would let them earn from their own names and images. It treats them more fairly like professional athletes.
Current rules are different in each state, which is confusing. Federal rules would be the same everywhere. This makes it fairer for all athletes and schools.
When rules differ by state, schools find ways around them. One national rule stops this confusion. It creates a level playing field for all teams.
Clear national rules can ensure athletes stay focused on education. Consistent standards might prevent schools from prioritizing sports over academics.
Big universities have more money than small schools. They could pay athletes more. Small schools might struggle to compete for top players.
Schools have traditionally made their own rules about athletics. This bill gives Washington control instead. States and schools lose decision-making power.
If schools must pay athletes, costs go up. These costs might be passed to students through higher tuition or fees.
Paying college athletes more might blur the line between college and professional sports. It could change what college sports mean.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
S 4668
Protect College Sports Act of 2026
HR 9723
Fit Future Act
HRES 1487
Recognizing the 1960 University of Missouri Tigers Football Team for its undefeated regular season, Orange Bowl victory, and claim to the 1960 National Championship.
HRES 1482
Recognizing 100 years of American Legion Baseball and the American Legion World Series, and honoring the city of Shelby, North Carolina, for serving as the permanent home of the American Legion World Series.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.