Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Direct Congress to assess the historic Scipio Jones House for preservation.
The problem
The Scipio Jones House, a historic property with cultural significance, lacks formal federal evaluation for protection or preservation status.
The proposal
The bill directs the House Committee on Natural Resources to conduct and complete an assessment of the Scipio Jones House.
The impact
Historic preservationists, local communities, and the National Register of Historic Places process may be affected by potential new listings.
Scipio Jones was a significant African American civil rights figure. Assessment could lead to formal recognition of his home's historical importance. This protects an important part of American heritage.
Assessment could result in National Register listing, providing legal protections against demolition. Federal designation brings preservation standards and potential funding.
Formal assessment increases public awareness of the property's historical value. Local communities gain acknowledgment of their cultural heritage.
Congressional assessment requires staff time and taxpayer funding. The cost-benefit of federal involvement for a single property may be questioned.
Assessment alone does not guarantee preservation or funding. The bill does not commit resources to actual restoration or maintenance.
The bill focuses only on assessment, leaving unclear what happens after completion. Without follow-up legislation, assessment may have limited practical effect.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.