Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Establishes tax treatment parity for digital assets like cryptocurrency.
The problem
Digital assets lack consistent tax rules compared to traditional investments, creating confusion for taxpayers and unequal treatment of different asset types.
The proposal
Aligns tax rules for digital assets with conventional investments, potentially affecting capital gains treatment, reporting requirements, and regulatory classification.
The impact
Cryptocurrency investors, traders, and financial institutions face changed tax obligations. Affects individual filers and businesses holding or trading digital assets.
Consistent tax treatment reduces confusion about when investors owe taxes on digital assets. Taxpayers benefit from rules matching traditional investments they already understand.
Applying same tax rules to digital and traditional assets treats all investors equally. Removes advantages some gained from unclear previous regulations.
Clearer rules make it easier for people to follow tax laws correctly. May reduce unintentional violations from confusion about reporting.
Standardized reporting and treatment may increase tax revenue collection. Helps ensure digital asset income is properly taxed like other investments.
Stricter tax rules and reporting may increase expenses for cryptocurrency traders and investors. Small investors could face burden from complex record-keeping requirements.
Cryptocurrency and digital asset businesses may face operational changes adapting to new requirements. Some business models built on previous tax rules could become less viable.
Higher regulatory burden and tax costs might discourage development of new digital asset technologies. Could slow growth in emerging crypto sectors.
Without seeing the full bill text, specific rules remain unknown and could create new confusion. Details matter greatly for how investors are actually affected.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10730
Healthy Communities Act of 2026
HR 5349
TAS Act
HR 9496
End Tax Penalties on American Hostages Act
HR 997
National Taxpayer Advocate Enhancement Act of 2025
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.