Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Requires transparency and public reporting of U.S. sister city agreements and activities.
The problem
Sister city programs operate with limited public oversight. Americans lack clear information about what these partnerships cost and accomplish.
The proposal
The bill mandates disclosure of sister city agreements, funding, participants, and outcomes to Congress and the public.
The impact
Sister city programs, state/local governments, and the public gain clearer information about international city partnerships and their expenses.
Transparency requirements help ensure taxpayer money is spent appropriately. Citizens can see what sister city programs do and cost. This promotes responsible use of public funds.
Americans gain access to details about international city partnerships. This helps citizens understand U.S. diplomatic and cultural activities. More information supports informed public discussion.
Disclosure requirements encourage better documentation and planning. Cities and organizations must clearly track activities and results. This can lead to more effective sister city programs.
Cities and organizations must collect and report detailed information. This creates additional paperwork and staff costs. Small cities may struggle with compliance requirements.
Public disclosure could expose sensitive diplomatic activities or participant information. Some international partnerships involve security considerations. Detailed reporting might compromise confidential relationships.
Heavy reporting requirements may discourage cities from forming new partnerships. Organizations might avoid programs due to compliance costs. This could limit cultural and economic exchange opportunities.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10748
Balkans Security Cooperation Act
SRES 939
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate that it values the active participation of the Republic of Kosovo as the state partner of the Iowa National Guard over the past 15 years.
HR 1744
United States Commission on International Religious Freedom Reauthorization Act of 2026
HCONRES 89
Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.