Latest action: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Strengthens cooperation between the US, Japan, and South Korea on shared security and policy goals.
The problem
The three democracies need stronger coordination on regional security, trade, and technology as China's influence grows in Asia.
The proposal
Establishes frameworks for trilateral coordination on defense, technology, trade, and diplomatic efforts between the US, Japan, and South Korea.
The impact
US foreign policy toward Asia, relations with Japan and South Korea, and regional stability in East Asia are affected.
Closer cooperation between three major democracies can deter aggression and improve shared defense capabilities. This enhances stability in East Asia where tensions exist with China and North Korea.
Joint efforts on semiconductors, AI, and other advanced tech can strengthen competitiveness against rivals. Shared standards and research benefit all three countries.
Trilateral trade and investment frameworks can create new business opportunities. Closer economic integration strengthens relationships and shared prosperity.
Coordinated positions on global issues give these democracies more influence. United stances are harder for adversaries to divide.
China views closer US-Japan-Korea ties as containment. This cooperation could escalate tensions and trigger retaliatory actions from China.
Formal trilateral structures can reduce each country's independent decision-making. Countries might feel obligated to support partners even when interests differ.
Military, technology, and diplomatic coordination requires significant funding. US taxpayers may bear substantial expenses for these efforts.
Japan and South Korea have historical tensions and different national priorities. Disagreements could weaken the trilateral partnership's effectiveness.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10748
Balkans Security Cooperation Act
SRES 939
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate that it values the active participation of the Republic of Kosovo as the state partner of the Iowa National Guard over the past 15 years.
HR 1744
United States Commission on International Religious Freedom Reauthorization Act of 2026
HCONRES 89
Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.