Latest action: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Addresses Iranian government statements and actions that encourage violence against specific groups.
The problem
The Iranian government has made public statements that some view as incitement to violence against certain populations, raising international concerns about threats and hostility.
The proposal
The bill likely creates mechanisms to document, respond to, or counter Iranian statements deemed incitement, though full legislative text is unavailable for precise details.
The impact
Affects U.S.-Iran relations, international diplomacy efforts, Americans concerned about safety, and Iranian government officials subject to potential sanctions or designations.
Acknowledges concerns about hostile rhetoric from foreign governments. Creates official U.S. response to statements viewed as dangerous incitement. May deter similar statements.
Provides documentation and recognition for groups targeted by hostile rhetoric. Shows U.S. commitment to protecting vulnerable populations from threats.
Gives government options to formally respond to hostile statements. Could reinforce international norms against incitement and violent rhetoric.
Could worsen U.S.-Iran relations and reduce diplomatic opportunities. Might provoke counter-responses that increase conflict rather than reduce it.
Determining what counts as 'incitement' involves subjective judgment. Different people may disagree on which statements cross the line into illegal incitement.
Iran unlikely to respond to U.S. legislation or change behavior because of it. May be symbolic action with minimal real-world impact.
Other countries might create similar bills targeting U.S. statements, creating tit-for-tat diplomatic disputes and reducing productive dialogue.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10748
Balkans Security Cooperation Act
SRES 939
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate that it values the active participation of the Republic of Kosovo as the state partner of the Iowa National Guard over the past 15 years.
HR 1744
United States Commission on International Religious Freedom Reauthorization Act of 2026
HCONRES 89
Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
No donor data found for current cycle
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.