Latest action: Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 511.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Sponsor
Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH)
Filed in the Senate.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Bill directs reassessment of United States diplomatic and economic relationship with Tanzania.
The problem
Current U.S.-Tanzania bilateral relationship may need review due to changing geopolitical, economic, or democratic governance concerns in the region.
The proposal
Legislation requires comprehensive reassessment of U.S. policy toward Tanzania, examining diplomatic engagement, trade relations, and strategic interests.
The impact
U.S. government officials, Tanzania, American businesses, and citizens with interests in East Africa face potential policy changes and relationship adjustments.
Reassessment allows the U.S. to align Tanzania policy with current national interests and regional conditions. This ensures foreign policy reflects present reality rather than outdated approaches.
Formal review can ensure U.S. support aligns with governance standards and human rights protections. This strengthens consistency in foreign aid and diplomatic partnerships.
Assessment may identify better trade opportunities or more balanced economic relationships. This could benefit American businesses and workers in relevant sectors.
Reassessment signals potential policy shifts, which could create instability in U.S.-Tanzania relations. This may strain cooperation on shared regional and global priorities.
Policy changes could disrupt existing trade relationships and business agreements between the two nations. American companies operating in Tanzania or importing Tanzanian goods could face uncertainty.
Changes to Tanzania policy could affect U.S. standing with other East African nations and regional organizations. This may complicate broader diplomatic goals in Africa.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10748
Balkans Security Cooperation Act
SRES 939
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate that it values the active participation of the Republic of Kosovo as the state partner of the Iowa National Guard over the past 15 years.
HR 1744
United States Commission on International Religious Freedom Reauthorization Act of 2026
HCONRES 89
Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.