Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill funds research on ground-level ozone pollution and its health effects.
The problem
Ground-level ozone damages air quality and human health. Scientists need more data to understand and reduce this pollution.
The proposal
The bill establishes research programs to study tropospheric ozone, its causes, and health impacts. It allocates funding for studies and monitoring.
The impact
Scientists, public health officials, and communities affected by air pollution gain better understanding. This could lead to cleaner air policies.
Research helps scientists understand what causes ground-level ozone and how to reduce it. This knowledge can lead to better air quality policies. Communities could have cleaner, healthier air.
Studies on ozone health effects help protect people from lung disease and asthma. Children and elderly people especially benefit from cleaner air. Better data helps doctors treat ozone-related illnesses.
Federal research funding advances American science and technology. It creates jobs for researchers and supports universities. Better science helps solve environmental problems.
Solid research data helps lawmakers make evidence-based environmental rules. This prevents wasting money on ineffective solutions. Rules based on science work better.
The bill requires taxpayer money for research programs. The cost is not specified in available information. Some argue federal research budgets are already large.
Research takes many years before producing useful results. Communities facing air pollution now may not see benefits soon. Businesses waiting for policy guidance may face uncertainty.
Research findings could lead to stricter air pollution regulations. Some industries may face higher compliance costs. Businesses may argue regulations hurt economic growth.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HRES 1606
Expressing support for the designation of the week of October 24, 2026, to October 31, 2026, as "Bat Week".
S 5640
Data Center Transparency Act of 2026
S 5604
Improving Species Recovery Act
S 5653
Bipartisan American Affordability and Jobs Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.