Latest action: By Senator Cotton from Select Committee on Intelligence filed written report. Report No. 119-133. Additional and Minority views filed.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Sponsor
Tom Cotton (R-AR)
Filed in the Senate.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
This bill authorizes funding and policies for U.S. intelligence agencies for fiscal year 2027.
The problem
Intelligence agencies need annual authorization of funds and updated policies to conduct national security operations effectively.
The proposal
The bill provides budget authority and policy guidance for U.S. intelligence community operations during fiscal year 2027.
The impact
Intelligence agencies, military, federal workforce, and national security operations are affected by authorized funding and policy changes.
Authorizing intelligence spending ensures agencies can conduct counterterrorism, counterintelligence, and foreign surveillance missions. This maintains operational capability to identify and prevent security threats.
Annual authorization bills allow Congress to review intelligence activities and adjust policies as needed. This enables democratic oversight of classified programs.
Authorized funding supports salaries and training for intelligence officers and analysts. This helps retain experienced professionals in government service.
Annual updates allow intelligence priorities to shift toward current threats like cyber attacks and new geopolitical challenges. This keeps national security strategy current.
Much intelligence authorization remains classified and unavailable to the public. Citizens cannot fully assess how intelligence money is spent or whether programs are effective.
Secret programs authorized in classified sections face reduced public and media scrutiny. This can make it harder to identify wasteful or problematic spending.
Intelligence agencies often request budget growth that goes largely unquestioned due to national security justifications. This limits fiscal restraint and debate.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 7683
VA Fiscal Management Modernization Act
HR 6698
Board of Veterans Appeals Annual Report Transparency Act of 2025
HR 7260
National Cemetery Administration Annual Report Act of 2026
HR 2283
Recognizing Community Organizations for Veteran Engagement and Recovery Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.