Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Creates a federal commission to study and address hate crimes in America.
The problem
Hate crimes remain a concern across the United States. Policymakers need better data and understanding of these crimes to develop effective responses.
The proposal
Establishes a new commission to investigate hate crimes, collect data, and recommend policies for preventing and responding to them.
The impact
Law enforcement, victims of hate crimes, civil rights organizations, and Congress gain better information. The commission could influence future hate crime policies.
A dedicated commission can systematically study hate crimes and identify patterns. This research could help law enforcement prevent crimes and protect communities.
The commission can gather data and expert input to recommend effective policies. Congress could use these recommendations to make better laws.
Focusing on hate crimes signals that the government takes these serious incidents seriously. This may help communities that experience hate crimes feel supported.
The commission can promote information-sharing between local, state, and federal law enforcement. Better coordination helps agencies respond more effectively.
Creating a new commission requires government funding and staff. Critics argue this adds bureaucracy rather than solving problems directly.
How the commission defines and studies hate crimes could be controversial. Different groups may disagree on what counts as a hate crime.
Even with good data, Congress may not act on the commission's recommendations. The commission could become ineffective without follow-up action.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10734
Title IX Take Responsibility Act of 2026
HRES 1493
Declaring unconditional war on racism and invidious discrimination and providing for the establishment of a Cabinet-level Department of Reconciliation charged with eliminating racism and invidious discrimination.
HR 10052
Right to Worship Act
SRES 819
A resolution condemning the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran for its ongoing human rights abuses, including its use of politically motivated espionage claims to justify arbitrary detention and executions.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.