Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Requires banks to prepare for using the Federal Reserve's emergency lending facility.
The problem
Banks may not be ready to quickly access emergency loans from the Federal Reserve during financial crises, potentially worsening economic instability.
The proposal
The bill mandates banks develop and maintain plans for accessing the Federal Reserve's discount window lending program.
The impact
Banks must create preparation procedures; Federal Reserve gains better emergency response capability; financial system resilience improves.
Banks prepared in advance can access emergency funds more quickly during crises. This reduces panic and helps stabilize markets faster.
Known preparedness procedures reassure depositors and investors that banks can handle emergencies. This confidence prevents bank runs and spreads of financial distress.
Having backup emergency funding plans protects the entire financial system. Prepared banks are less likely to fail during economic downturns.
Established procedures improve communication between banks and the Federal Reserve. This coordination works better than scrambled last-minute arrangements.
Banks must spend money and staff time creating and maintaining discount window plans. Smaller banks may struggle more with these requirements.
If banks know emergency loans are guaranteed through preparedness, they might take more risky investments. This could increase overall financial system risk.
Banks in countries without such requirements might have lower costs. U.S. banks face higher compliance expenses than global competitors.
Preparedness planning helps during crises but does not prevent the problems that cause financial emergencies in the first place.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
S 5639
Portal for Appraisal Licensing Act of 2026
S 1564
Floodplain Enhancement and Recovery Act
HR 1190
Expanding Access to Capital for Rural Job Creators Act
HR 7730
Bankruptcy Threshold Adjustment Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
No donor data found for current cycle
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.