Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Select Committee on Intelligence.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill aims to prevent Chinese technology from being used in U.S. military and intelligence systems.
The problem
U.S. officials worry that Chinese-made technology could contain spy tools that threaten American military secrets and national security.
The proposal
The bill would block the purchase and use of certain Chinese technology in U.S. defense and intelligence agencies' equipment and systems.
The impact
Defense contractors, tech companies, and government agencies would need to find alternative suppliers. Could affect costs and timelines for military projects.
Prevents potential backdoors or surveillance tools in Chinese technology from accessing classified U.S. military information. Reduces risk of espionage through supply chain vulnerabilities.
Encourages the U.S. to develop and use domestically-made or trusted allied technology for sensitive military systems. Reduces dependence on foreign suppliers for critical defense needs.
Could increase demand for American-made technology and microchips in defense contracts. May boost investment in domestic tech manufacturing and jobs.
Matches security policies of other democracies restricting Chinese tech in defense sectors. Strengthens cooperation on protecting shared security interests.
Replacing Chinese components with alternatives may be more expensive, increasing military budget needs. Defense contractors might pass higher costs to the government.
China could respond by restricting American companies or technology sales in their markets. Could hurt U.S. businesses that operate internationally.
Identifying all Chinese technology already in use across military systems would be difficult and time-consuming. May require expensive audits and replacements.
Finding and switching to alternative suppliers could delay important defense programs and weapons development. May temporarily weaken military readiness.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 7683
VA Fiscal Management Modernization Act
HR 6698
Board of Veterans Appeals Annual Report Transparency Act of 2025
HR 7260
National Cemetery Administration Annual Report Act of 2026
HR 2283
Recognizing Community Organizations for Veteran Engagement and Recovery Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.