Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill aims to protect U.S. research and innovation from adversarial countries' espionage and theft.
The problem
Foreign adversaries may steal American research, technology secrets, and intellectual property from universities and companies, threatening national security.
The proposal
Establishes rules and oversight for research activities to identify and prevent foreign intelligence operations targeting U.S. innovation.
The impact
Researchers, universities, companies, and international collaborators face new requirements and restrictions on certain research partnerships.
Reduces risk of sensitive technology and research being stolen by hostile nations. Helps keep military, medical, and advanced technology advantages secure. Supports American competitiveness globally.
Protects American companies' investments in research and development. Prevents competitors from gaining unfair advantage through espionage. Creates safer environment for high-value research.
Provides clear guidelines about what international partnerships are allowed. Helps universities and companies understand obligations. Reduces confusion about compliance requirements.
Could restrict beneficial partnerships between American and foreign researchers. May slow scientific progress in fields needing global cooperation like medicine and climate research. Could harm relationships with allied countries.
Universities and companies need new systems to track and report research activities. Increases administrative costs and staff time. Smaller institutions may struggle more with requirements.
Increased scrutiny of foreign nationals or researchers from certain countries could create discrimination. May discourage talented international students from studying in America. Could raise legal and ethical questions.
Summary lacks specifics on how rules will work or what penalties apply. Unclear which research areas are covered or how restrictions are enforced. Creates uncertainty for institutions.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10748
Balkans Security Cooperation Act
SRES 939
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate that it values the active participation of the Republic of Kosovo as the state partner of the Iowa National Guard over the past 15 years.
HR 1744
United States Commission on International Religious Freedom Reauthorization Act of 2026
HCONRES 89
Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.