Latest action: Committee on Environment and Public Works. Hearings held.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Reauthorizes Great Lakes Restoration Initiative funding and programs through 2030.
The problem
The Great Lakes face pollution, invasive species, and habitat damage. Current restoration funding expires. Continued investment needed to protect this vital freshwater resource.
The proposal
Bill extends Great Lakes Restoration Initiative authority and likely increases or maintains federal funding for cleanup, environmental monitoring, and ecosystem protection projects.
The impact
Great Lakes states, municipalities, environmental groups, and residents benefit from restoration funding. Taxpayers fund the program. Shipping and fishing industries affected by environmental changes.
The Great Lakes provide drinking water to 30 million people. Restoration funding helps remove pollutants and protect water quality. This directly benefits public health across the region.
Fishing, tourism, and shipping industries depend on healthy lakes. Restoration protects these jobs and economic activity. Communities around the lakes benefit from sustained economic value.
Funding tackles invasive species, wetland recovery, and habitat restoration. These projects improve biodiversity and ecosystem health across the region.
Great Lakes restoration has historically attracted support from both parties. Multiple states benefit, reducing partisan division on the issue.
Extending the program requires federal appropriations. Some argue resources should prioritize other national needs or reduce overall government spending.
Without specific funding levels in bill summary, total costs remain unknown. This makes fiscal impact difficult to evaluate precisely.
Focuses only on Great Lakes region. Other waterways and environmental priorities may receive less attention or funding if resources are limited.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HRES 1606
Expressing support for the designation of the week of October 24, 2026, to October 31, 2026, as "Bat Week".
S 5640
Data Center Transparency Act of 2026
S 5604
Improving Species Recovery Act
S 5653
Bipartisan American Affordability and Jobs Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.