Latest action: Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 49 - 0.
Committee has approved the bill (usually with amendments) and sent it back to the full chamber.
The committee voted to send the bill to the floor of the full chamber. The Speaker of the House schedules a floor vote.
Next: Passed One Chamber
The other chamber (Senate or House) repeats the committee + floor-vote process
Coordinates U.S. sanctions lists across government agencies for consistency.
The problem
Different U.S. agencies maintain separate sanctions lists that sometimes conflict or duplicate, creating confusion for businesses and government enforcement.
The proposal
Standardizes and harmonizes sanctions lists across federal agencies to reduce duplication and improve coordination in sanctions administration.
The impact
Affects businesses doing international trade, government agencies enforcing sanctions, and foreign entities subject to U.S. sanctions rules.
Companies will have one consistent sanctions list to follow instead of checking multiple agency lists. This reduces mistakes and compliance costs. Businesses can operate with more certainty about who they can trade with.
Agencies will coordinate better and avoid duplicate work. This saves taxpayer money and makes enforcement more effective. Government workers spend less time managing conflicting information.
Harmonized lists make it harder for bad actors to exploit gaps between agencies. Coordinated enforcement prevents sanctions evasion. The U.S. can more effectively target entities breaking sanctions rules.
When lists are unified, legitimate businesses accidentally breaking sanctions rules decreases. Companies get clearer guidance. This reduces legal disputes over unintentional violations.
Harmonizing lists might reduce each agency's ability to customize sanctions for their specific needs. Different agencies have different foreign policy goals. One unified list could be too rigid.
Agencies built their lists differently and for different reasons over many years. Getting them to agree on one list will be complicated and time-consuming. The transition period could create temporary confusion.
Combining lists might mean adopting the lowest common standard instead of the strongest protections. If agencies disagree on who should be sanctioned, important entities might slip through. The final list could be less effective.
Different agencies have different legal powers to impose sanctions under different laws. Forcing one unified list could create legal conflicts. Some agencies might lose their ability to enforce their specific mandates.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10748
Balkans Security Cooperation Act
SRES 939
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate that it values the active participation of the Republic of Kosovo as the state partner of the Iowa National Guard over the past 15 years.
HR 1744
United States Commission on International Religious Freedom Reauthorization Act of 2026
HCONRES 89
Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.