Latest action: Referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committees on Oversight and Government Reform, and Financial Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Addresses vacant properties by incentivizing their productive reuse and development.
The problem
Many buildings sit empty in communities, attracting crime, lowering property values, and wasting urban land that could house people or create jobs.
The proposal
Creates incentives and tools to convert vacant properties into housing, businesses, or other productive uses through federal programs and policies.
The impact
Property owners, cities, developers, and people needing affordable housing are affected by changes in how vacant buildings are managed and redeveloped.
Converting vacant buildings to homes could increase affordable housing availability in communities. This helps people find places to live and stabilizes neighborhoods.
Renovating vacant properties creates construction jobs and attracts businesses to neighborhoods. This generates tax revenue and economic activity in struggling areas.
Abandoned buildings often attract crime and drug activity. Filling these spaces with legitimate uses reduces these problems and makes neighborhoods safer.
Empty buildings lower surrounding property values and create eyesores. Redevelopment improves neighborhood appearance and community pride.
Federal incentive programs require taxpayer funding. Critics worry about costs and whether private developers should fund their own projects.
Some property owners may lack resources for renovation or face legal complications. New rules could impose burdensome requirements or penalties.
Programs may work better in wealthy areas than poor ones. Communities needing help most might not receive fair resources.
Revitalizing neighborhoods can raise property values and rents, displacing long-time residents who cannot afford higher costs.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
1 citizen have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
1
citizen has voted on this bill
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
S 5652
Build American Efficiency Act
HR 4646
Whistleblower Protection Act of 2025
HR 1640
HEIRS Act of 2025
HR 10168
Veterans Housing Opportunity Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.