Latest action: Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Blocks U.S. funding for UNIFIL, a United Nations peacekeeping force in Lebanon.
The problem
The bill addresses concerns about U.S. funding for UNIFIL operations. Supporters may question the effectiveness or appropriateness of American financial support for this UN mission.
The proposal
The bill prohibits the United States from providing financial or military support to UNIFIL, the UN interim force operating in southern Lebanon.
The impact
U.S. taxpayers would stop funding UNIFIL. The UN peacekeeping mission would lose American financial contributions. U.S.-Lebanon relations could be affected.
Eliminates American taxpayer funding going to UNIFIL operations. Could redirect those funds to domestic priorities or reduce federal spending. Supporters argue the U.S. contributes disproportionately to UN peacekeeping costs.
Gives Congress control over how these funds are spent instead of contributing to international operations. Allows the government to allocate resources differently based on priorities.
Forces evaluation of whether UNIFIL effectively achieves its mission. Questions the value of continued U.S. involvement in this particular peacekeeping operation.
Addresses potential concerns about UNIFIL's effectiveness or neutrality. Allows the U.S. to step back from funding operations it may view as insufficient or problematic.
Loss of U.S. funding could reduce UNIFIL's capability to maintain peace in southern Lebanon. May lead to reduced troop strength, equipment, or operational effectiveness without American financial support.
Withdrawing funding typically reduces a country's say in how operations are conducted. The U.S. would have less ability to shape UNIFIL policies and priorities.
UNIFIL helps prevent conflict between Israel and Lebanon. Weakening the force could increase regional tensions and the risk of conflict, affecting American interests and allies in the Middle East.
Other countries and the UN may view this as U.S. withdrawal from international peacekeeping cooperation. Could harm America's diplomatic relationships and influence in global affairs.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
1 citizen have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
1
citizen has voted on this bill
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10748
Balkans Security Cooperation Act
SRES 939
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate that it values the active participation of the Republic of Kosovo as the state partner of the Iowa National Guard over the past 15 years.
HR 1744
United States Commission on International Religious Freedom Reauthorization Act of 2026
HCONRES 89
Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.