Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Prevents the President from suing the United States government in civil court.
The problem
Unclear whether Presidents can file lawsuits against the federal government. This bill addresses potential conflicts of interest if a President uses courts against their own administration.
The proposal
The bill adds a legal ban stopping any President from filing civil lawsuits against the United States or its agencies while in office.
The impact
Presidents lose the ability to sue the federal government. Affects executive branch operations and presidential legal rights during their term.
Stops a President from suing their own government, which could create confusion about who represents the country's interests. This keeps the executive branch from fighting itself in court.
Avoids the weird situation where a President's lawyers would argue against other government lawyers. Keeps the administration working as one team instead of splitting into court opponents.
May prevent a President from using courts for political purposes against federal agencies. Protects the court system from being used for internal government disputes.
Presidents normally have the same legal rights as other citizens to sue. This bill takes away a fundamental right without explaining why it is necessary or how often it happens.
A President might have a real legal claim against the government that gets blocked by this law. Other citizens can sue the government, but a President cannot, creating unequal treatment.
The bill provides no summary or explanation of the actual problem it solves. Without official reasoning, it is unclear why this restriction is needed or what problems it prevents.
Courts might strike down this law as unfairly removing rights from Presidents. Constitutional questions about equal treatment under law could make this rule unenforceable.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10764
Executive Settlement Review Act
HR 8352
Criminal History Access Act of 2026
S 32
LACA
HR 10389
Survivor’s Voice Protection Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
No donor data found for current cycle
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.