Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
This House Concurrent Resolution (HCONRES 106) would direct the removal of U.S. Armed Forces from any military hostilities involving Cuba that have not been explicitly authorized by Congress. A concurrent resolution is a statement of congressional intent that does not carry the force of law but expresses the will of the House and Senate. The bill essentially requires that any military actions the U.S. might take related to Cuba must first receive formal congressional approval rather than being initiated unilaterally by the President. The resolution addresses the constitutional principle that Congress holds the power to declare war and authorize military action, as stated in Article I of the Constitution. It would prevent unauthorized military operations in or against Cuba and ensure that such decisions go through the full legislative process. This is a check on executive power designed to prevent military escalation without democratic debate and approval.
The resolution reinforces the constitutional requirement that Congress, not the President alone, authorizes military action. This maintains the system of checks and balances intended by the Founders and ensures major military decisions receive legislative scrutiny and democratic debate.
By requiring congressional authorization, the bill would prevent unilateral military operations that could escalate international tensions without public or legislative input. This provides a procedural safeguard against impulsive or undeclared military engagements.
Military actions authorized through Congress require public debate and recorded votes, making government decision-making more transparent. Citizens and their representatives can evaluate arguments for military action before it occurs.
The measure constrains presidential power to initiate military hostilities unilaterally, preventing executives from circumventing Congress through claims of emergency or national security without legislative approval.
Requiring congressional authorization for all Cuba-related military actions could slow response times in genuine emergency situations where immediate action might be necessary. Congressional deliberation takes time, which could be problematic in urgent security scenarios.
Publicly requiring congressional approval for potential military action against Cuba could weaken U.S. negotiating positions and signal constraints to adversaries. It may reduce the credibility of military threats used in diplomatic contexts.
The bill specifically targets Cuba while the broader principle of congressional war powers applies globally. This targeted approach may be inconsistently applied and could set a precedent suggesting certain regions don't require the same oversight.
As a concurrent resolution rather than binding legislation, this measure carries no legal force and cannot compel compliance if the President chooses to ignore it. Its effectiveness depends entirely on voluntary adherence and political pressure.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
1 citizen have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
1
citizen has voted on this bill
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10748
Balkans Security Cooperation Act
SRES 939
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate that it values the active participation of the Republic of Kosovo as the state partner of the Iowa National Guard over the past 15 years.
HR 1744
United States Commission on International Religious Freedom Reauthorization Act of 2026
HCONRES 89
Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.