Latest action: Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committees on Transportation and Infrastructure, Natural Resources, Science, Space, and Technology, Energy and Commerce, Agriculture, Appropriations, Financial Services, and Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Filed in the House.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Removes tax breaks and subsidies for fossil fuel and polluting industries.
The problem
The government provides tax breaks and financial support to coal, oil, and gas companies. Critics say these subsidies harm the environment and cost taxpayers billions annually.
The proposal
Eliminates federal tax deductions, credits, and subsidies for fossil fuel companies and other polluting industries. Redirects support toward clean energy development.
The impact
Oil, coal, and gas companies would pay more taxes. Clean energy companies could receive more funding. Taxpayers might see changes in energy costs and government revenue.
Fossil fuel companies would no longer receive government money through tax breaks. This saves taxpayers billions of dollars yearly that currently subsidize these industries.
Redirecting subsidies to renewable energy companies could accelerate solar, wind, and other clean technologies. This creates new jobs in growing industries.
Less government support for fossil fuels may reduce coal and oil production. This typically decreases pollution that harms public health and the environment.
Clean energy companies compete without subsidies while fossil fuels received them. Removing these breaks makes competition more fair between energy sources.
If fossil fuel companies raise prices to offset lost tax breaks, consumers might pay more for electricity and gas. This affects household budgets and business costs.
Coal, oil, and gas companies might cut workers or production if subsidies end. Communities dependent on these industries could face economic hardship.
Many rural communities depend on coal and oil production for jobs and tax revenue. Removing subsidies might hurt these economies more than urban areas.
The bill may not account for how long it takes to build clean energy infrastructure. Sudden shifts could create temporary energy shortages or reliability issues.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10730
Healthy Communities Act of 2026
HR 5349
TAS Act
HR 9496
End Tax Penalties on American Hostages Act
HR 997
National Taxpayer Advocate Enhancement Act of 2025
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.