Latest action: Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote.
Committee has approved the bill (usually with amendments) and sent it back to the full chamber.
The committee voted to send the bill to the floor of the full chamber. The Speaker of the House schedules a floor vote.
Next: Passed One Chamber
The other chamber (Senate or House) repeats the committee + floor-vote process
Protects Americans from Russian lawsuits in U.S. courts during ongoing conflicts.
The problem
Russian entities may file lawsuits against Americans in U.S. courts to harass them or gain legal advantages during geopolitical tensions and military conflicts.
The proposal
Restricts Russian government and related entities from suing in American courts unless specifically authorized by the Secretary of State.
The impact
Affects Russians seeking legal action in U.S. courts, American defendants facing Russian litigation, and the federal government's foreign policy flexibility.
Prevents Russian entities from using American courts as a tool to intimidate or burden U.S. citizens and businesses with frivolous lawsuits during conflicts. This reduces legal costs and complications for Americans targeted for political reasons.
Strengthens national security by restricting legal access for hostile foreign governments. This prevents Russia from weaponizing the court system to gain strategic advantages.
Gives the State Department another tool to respond to Russian aggression without military escalation. This provides flexibility in managing diplomatic relationships.
Prevents courts from being overwhelmed by politically motivated cases from hostile nations. This preserves court resources for genuine disputes.
May conflict with international agreements guaranteeing access to courts and fair legal processes. Other nations could cite this as precedent to deny Americans legal access abroad.
May harm innocent Russian individuals or companies trying to resolve legitimate disputes in American courts. Creates collective punishment based on nationality.
Concentrates significant authority in one official without clear standards for granting exceptions. This could be abused or applied inconsistently based on political preferences.
Russia could retaliate by blocking Americans from suing in Russian courts or seizing Russian assets held in the U.S. This harms Americans seeking legal remedies against Russian entities.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10764
Executive Settlement Review Act
HR 8352
Criminal History Access Act of 2026
S 32
LACA
HR 10389
Survivor’s Voice Protection Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.