Latest action: Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Intelligence (Permanent Select), for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Filed in the House.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Bill requires court approval before government conducts surveillance without warrants.
The problem
Government agencies may conduct surveillance on Americans without court approval, raising concerns about privacy rights and government power overreach.
The proposal
Requires law enforcement and intelligence agencies to obtain warrants before conducting electronic surveillance, limiting warrantless monitoring activities.
The impact
Americans' privacy may increase; law enforcement agencies must follow stricter approval processes; national security operations may face procedural delays.
Requires warrants based on probable cause before surveillance, similar to protections for homes and personal property. This helps prevent government from monitoring citizens without good reason. Aligns with Fourth Amendment protections.
Requires judges to review surveillance requests, creating oversight. Documents surveillance activities through warrant records. Makes it harder for agencies to conduct secret monitoring.
Transparent warrant process may increase confidence in government institutions. Citizens understand surveillance occurs only when legally justified. Addresses public concerns about privacy violations.
Establishes consistent rules across all agencies. Reduces confusion about what surveillance is legal. Creates uniform procedures nationwide.
Warrant requirements add time to surveillance requests. Intelligence agencies cannot respond instantly to threats. Could delay investigations during emergencies.
Restrictions might limit ability to monitor foreign threats or terrorist activity. Some argue warrantless surveillance is necessary for national defense. May reduce government's intelligence-gathering capability.
Agencies must train staff on new warrant procedures. Courts need resources to handle warrant applications quickly. Creates additional administrative burden.
Courts may be overwhelmed with warrant requests. Judges must review many applications quickly during crises. System could become inefficient under heavy demand.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 7683
VA Fiscal Management Modernization Act
HR 6698
Board of Veterans Appeals Annual Report Transparency Act of 2025
HR 7260
National Cemetery Administration Annual Report Act of 2026
HR 2283
Recognizing Community Organizations for Veteran Engagement and Recovery Act
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.