Latest action: Held at the desk.
Originating chamber has voted to pass. Sent to the other chamber.
The Senate voted to pass the bill. It now moves to the House, which repeats the committee referral and floor-vote process.
Next: Passed Both Chambers
Conference committee (if versions differ), then the President
Prevents Russian entities from suing Americans in U.S. courts.
The problem
Russian government and companies may use lawsuits in American courts as a political tool or to harass U.S. citizens and businesses.
The proposal
Bars Russian state entities and their controlled companies from filing lawsuits in U.S. federal or state courts.
The impact
American businesses and citizens gain legal protection from Russian litigation. Russian entities lose ability to sue in U.S. courts.
Prevents Russia from using American court systems as a weapon against U.S. citizens and businesses. Shields Americans from frivolous suits designed to harm or harass.
Lowers number of cases judges must handle by eliminating suits from Russian state entities. Frees up court resources for other cases.
Reduces opportunities for Russia to gather information or influence American legal processes. Limits foreign government interference in U.S. institutions.
Shows U.S. commitment to countering Russian actions. Aligns legal policy with national security concerns regarding Russia.
Prevents legitimate Russian businesses or entities from defending themselves in court if sued. May unfairly block valid legal claims by Russian parties.
Russia could respond by banning American companies from its courts. Could harm U.S. businesses operating in or dealing with Russia.
Does not distinguish between connected entities and independent Russian businesses. May punish non-political Russian companies unfairly.
Bill title suggests it targets Russian litigation broadly, but details matter. Vague language could create confusion about which entities are actually blocked.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10764
Executive Settlement Review Act
HR 8352
Criminal History Access Act of 2026
S 32
LACA
HR 10389
Survivor’s Voice Protection Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.