Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Filed in the House.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Increases pay for people serving on juries in Washington, D.C. to match federal employee rates.
The problem
D.C. jurors earn significantly less than federal employees doing similar civic service, making jury duty financially burdensome for many residents and potentially affecting jury participation rates.
The proposal
Raises juror compensation in D.C. to align with federal juror pay standards, ensuring citizens receive fairer payment for their time serving on juries.
The impact
D.C. residents serving on juries receive higher pay. This affects the D.C. court budget, juror participation willingness, and potentially improves jury representation across income levels.
Jurors sacrifice time and income to serve. Higher pay recognizes this sacrifice and compensates citizens fairly for their important civic responsibility. This makes jury service less financially painful for working people.
Low pay discourages people from serving, especially lower-income workers who cannot afford lost wages. Better compensation encourages more people to participate, creating more representative juries.
D.C. is the nation's capital where federal courts operate. Matching federal juror pay creates consistent standards and treats D.C. jurors the same as federal court jurors.
Low-income jurors suffer most from unpaid jury duty. Higher pay reduces financial stress for people who can least afford lost income, promoting fairness and access to justice.
Higher juror pay means the D.C. court system must spend more money on compensation. This requires either budget increases, cuts elsewhere, or finding new funding sources for the judicial system.
Without details on jury participation rates and case numbers, it is unclear how much this will actually cost. The fiscal impact cannot be fully assessed without more information.
Low jury participation stems from multiple causes including inconvenience, inflexible schedules, and lack of childcare support. Higher pay alone may not solve all participation issues.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10764
Executive Settlement Review Act
HR 8352
Criminal History Access Act of 2026
S 32
LACA
HR 10389
Survivor’s Voice Protection Act
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.