Latest action: Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 246.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Filed in the Senate.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Bill designates Russia as a state sponsor of terrorism.
The problem
The bill responds to concerns about Russian government actions, including military aggression, alleged support for militant groups, and destabilizing activities internationally.
The proposal
The bill formally designates the Russian Federation as a state sponsor of terrorism, triggering legal consequences and restrictions on U.S. dealings with Russia.
The impact
Affects U.S.-Russia relations, trade, diplomacy, and Americans with Russian connections. Impacts defense policy, sanctions, and international alliances.
Designation could acknowledge concerns about Russian military actions and alleged support for groups the U.S. considers terrorist organizations. It formalizes the government's position on these activities.
Designating a country as a terror sponsor automatically activates legal restrictions, including asset freezes and export controls. This creates legal tools to restrict certain interactions.
Could signal strong U.S. commitment to allies, particularly Eastern European nations, regarding Russia policy. May reinforce partnerships with countries concerned about Russian actions.
May reflect strong bipartisan concerns about Russian government conduct. Could satisfy those wanting stronger official U.S. positions on Russia.
Such designation makes diplomatic engagement and negotiations much harder. Historically, terrorism designations severely limit official government-to-government communication and problem-solving.
Triggers harsh sanctions and trade restrictions affecting American businesses, agricultural exports, and energy markets. Could raise prices for American consumers on certain goods.
Russia might respond with counter-sanctions or aggressive actions against U.S. allies. Could increase international tensions and military confrontation risks rather than reduce them.
Designating a nation-state as terrorist differs from designating organizations. Legal experts debate whether this fits traditional terrorism law frameworks designed for groups, not countries.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10748
Balkans Security Cooperation Act
SRES 939
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate that it values the active participation of the Republic of Kosovo as the state partner of the Iowa National Guard over the past 15 years.
HR 1744
United States Commission on International Religious Freedom Reauthorization Act of 2026
HCONRES 89
Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.