Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Filed in the House.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Exempts certain forest management activities in Yosemite National Park from environmental review requirements.
The problem
Forest management projects in Yosemite may face delays due to lengthy environmental review processes required by federal law, potentially limiting active forest management.
The proposal
The bill removes the requirement for environmental impact reviews under the National Environmental Policy Act for specified forest management activities at Yosemite National Park.
The impact
Park managers gain faster approval for forest projects; environmentalists lose guaranteed review process; nearby communities and wildlife habitats are potentially affected by expedited projects.
Removing review requirements allows the park to conduct forest management more quickly. This could help address fire hazards, disease, or overgrowth more rapidly.
Environmental reviews are expensive and time-consuming. Exempting these activities saves money that could be spent on actual forest work instead of paperwork.
Faster project approval enables park officials to respond quickly to forest health threats like bark beetles, disease, or dense vegetation that increases fire risk.
Environmental reviews ensure projects don't harm ecosystems. Skipping reviews removes a safeguard that protects plants, animals, and water quality in the park.
Environmental reviews typically include public comment periods. Exempting projects means local communities and conservation groups cannot weigh in on park decisions.
Without environmental analysis, unintended consequences to wildlife habitats, scenic areas, or visitor experience may not be identified before projects begin.
Exempting one park from environmental law could encourage similar exemptions elsewhere, weakening protections across the national park system.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HRES 1606
Expressing support for the designation of the week of October 24, 2026, to October 31, 2026, as "Bat Week".
S 5640
Data Center Transparency Act of 2026
S 5604
Improving Species Recovery Act
S 5653
Bipartisan American Affordability and Jobs Act of 2026
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.