Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Filed in the Senate.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Strengthens U.S. support and coordination with Taiwan on security, trade, and diplomatic matters.
The problem
Taiwan faces increasing pressure from China. The U.S. seeks clearer policies for supporting Taiwan's independence and security without formal recognition.
The proposal
The bill establishes formal mechanisms for U.S.-Taiwan cooperation on defense, economic partnerships, and international representation while maintaining existing diplomatic frameworks.
The impact
Affects U.S.-China relations, Taiwan's security position, American defense contractors, technology companies, and international diplomatic balance in the Indo-Pacific region.
Provides Taiwan with clearer U.S. security commitments and support. Reinforces democratic governance in a strategic region threatened by authoritarian pressure. Demonstrates commitment to democratic nations.
Expands trade and technology cooperation with Taiwan. Benefits U.S. semiconductor and technology companies. Creates new commercial opportunities in a major economic partner.
Clear U.S. policy may deter military aggression across the Taiwan Strait. Provides certainty for businesses and investors in the region. Promotes peace through transparency.
Taiwan support enjoys broad congressional backing across parties. Shows unified American commitment to shared values and regional interests.
May escalate tensions with China, which views Taiwan support as interference. Could trigger retaliatory economic or military actions. Risks competition turning into confrontation.
Conflicts with the One China policy the U.S. officially maintains since 1979. May strain U.S.-China relations on trade and other issues. Creates ambiguity in formal policy.
Increased U.S. military support could provoke Chinese military buildup. Risks spiraling arms race in the region. May make military conflict more likely rather than less.
Trade tensions with China could harm American businesses and consumers. Supply chain disruptions possible if China retaliates. Economic costs may outweigh benefits.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10748
Balkans Security Cooperation Act
SRES 939
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate that it values the active participation of the Republic of Kosovo as the state partner of the Iowa National Guard over the past 15 years.
HR 1744
United States Commission on International Religious Freedom Reauthorization Act of 2026
HCONRES 89
Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.