Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill to reform government surveillance practices and oversight procedures.
The problem
Current surveillance laws may lack sufficient oversight, transparency, and accountability mechanisms to protect citizen privacy while maintaining national security.
The proposal
Establishes new oversight requirements, transparency measures, and accountability procedures for government surveillance activities conducted by federal agencies.
The impact
Citizens, federal agencies, courts, and privacy advocates affected by changes to how government monitors communications and data collection practices.
New oversight mechanisms could require agencies to justify surveillance activities. This may prevent abuse of surveillance powers and ensure compliance with constitutional protections. Independent review could catch inappropriate monitoring.
Reforms may require disclosure of surveillance programs to Congress and public. Citizens and lawmakers gain better understanding of government monitoring activities. Transparency can build trust in intelligence operations.
Stronger rules could limit collection of personal data without warrants. Americans may have clearer rights regarding who accesses their information. Privacy safeguards could strengthen constitutional protections.
Courts may gain authority to review surveillance decisions. Independent judges can check whether agencies follow legal requirements. This creates another layer of protection against overreach.
New restrictions could slow intelligence gathering and threat detection. Delays in surveillance authorization might prevent agencies from responding quickly to terrorism threats. National security operations could become less efficient.
Oversight requirements and compliance procedures require additional staff and resources. Agencies may need new training, documentation systems, and legal reviews. Taxpayers could bear higher costs for surveillance programs.
Complex new procedures could create bureaucratic delays in urgent situations. Agencies must navigate stricter rules while protecting national interests. This could make intelligence work slower and more difficult.
Bill provides no official summary, making exact requirements unclear. Agencies may struggle to understand new rules without detailed guidance. Vague language could create confusion about compliance expectations.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 7683
VA Fiscal Management Modernization Act
HR 6698
Board of Veterans Appeals Annual Report Transparency Act of 2025
HR 7260
National Cemetery Administration Annual Report Act of 2026
HR 2283
Recognizing Community Organizations for Veteran Engagement and Recovery Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.