Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Filed in the House.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Creates a special prosecutor to investigate DHS officers for illegal actions after January 20, 2025.
The problem
Concerns that Department of Homeland Security employees may have committed unlawful acts that need independent investigation outside normal oversight.
The proposal
Establishes a special prosecutor position to investigate and potentially prosecute DHS officers and employees for illegal conduct.
The impact
DHS employees face potential criminal investigations. Citizens concerned about DHS conduct may see independent oversight. Government operations could be affected.
A special prosecutor outside normal chains of command could investigate DHS actions impartially. This could ensure accountability if government employees break laws. Independent review may increase public trust in investigations.
Dedicated investigation authority could identify if DHS violated citizens' rights. This addresses concerns about government overreach. Accountability may deter future misconduct.
Applying law uniformly to all government employees, including DHS staff, upholds equal justice. This ensures no group is above the law.
Special prosecutors can become tools for partisan attacks on political opponents. This position targeting one agency starting at a specific date could appear motivated by politics rather than genuine oversight needs.
DHS employees facing investigation may focus on legal defense rather than border security and counterterrorism duties. Operations could be disrupted by uncertainty and resource diversion.
Existing inspector generals, DOJ, and congressional oversight already investigate government misconduct. A new prosecutor creates redundant bureaucracy and additional government spending.
The bill doesn't clearly define what constitutes 'unlawful action' or establish clear criteria for investigations. Broad authority could lead to unfocused or endless inquiries.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10764
Executive Settlement Review Act
HR 8352
Criminal History Access Act of 2026
S 32
LACA
HR 10389
Survivor’s Voice Protection Act
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.