Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Filed in the House.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Protects domestic violence survivors from housing discrimination when seeking new homes.
The problem
Domestic violence survivors often face housing discrimination based on their abuse history, criminal records from abuse incidents, or protective orders, making it harder to find safe housing.
The proposal
Adds protections to fair housing laws to prevent landlords from denying housing to survivors of domestic violence, sexual assault, or stalking based on their past experiences.
The impact
Domestic violence survivors gain better access to housing; landlords face new legal restrictions on tenant screening; housing markets adjust rental practices.
Survivors of domestic violence gain better ability to find safe housing away from abusers. This helps people escape dangerous situations and rebuild their lives. Housing stability is linked to better health and economic outcomes.
Prevents survivors from becoming homeless due to housing discrimination. Stable housing reduces costs for emergency services and social support programs. Communities benefit from fewer people experiencing homelessness.
Makes it illegal for landlords to use abuse-related records against tenants. Survivors can seek housing without fear of automatic rejection. Encourages survivors to report abuse without worry about housing consequences.
Provides clear legal standards for housing providers about what discrimination is illegal. Reduces confusion about tenant screening practices. Creates consistent rules across states and communities.
Landlords may have difficulty assessing tenant reliability if certain background information is restricted. This could create uncertainty about which screening practices are legal. Small landlords especially may struggle to understand new rules.
Some landlords might respond by being more cautious or raising screening costs. Higher compliance costs could be passed to renters through higher rents. Market effects depend on how strictly the law is enforced.
How the law gets enforced and what counts as illegal discrimination may take time to clarify. Survivors still need access to legal help to fight discrimination. Courts may interpret protections differently in different regions.
The bill summary lacks detail on exactly which records and situations are protected. Different interpretations could create legal confusion. Organizations may disagree about what constitutes unlawful discrimination.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
S 5652
Build American Efficiency Act
HR 4646
Whistleblower Protection Act of 2025
HR 1640
HEIRS Act of 2025
HR 10168
Veterans Housing Opportunity Act
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.