Latest action: Referred to the Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and Poultry.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Filed in the House.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Strengthens federal program to eliminate cattle fever ticks from U.S. livestock.
The problem
Cattle fever ticks threaten livestock health and agricultural productivity in border regions. They spread disease, reduce animal productivity, and limit cattle movement across state lines.
The proposal
Bill enhances federal tick eradication efforts through improved funding, coordination, and resources for prevention and elimination programs targeting affected cattle herds.
The impact
Cattle ranchers benefit from disease prevention. Consumers may see stable meat prices. Border region economies and rural communities reliant on livestock gain economic protection.
Reducing tick populations prevents cattle fever, keeping herds healthy and productive. This protects farmers' investments and ensures consistent food supply for consumers.
Ranchers can maintain larger herds and trade cattle across state lines more freely. This strengthens agricultural regions and rural communities that depend on livestock.
Strong eradication programs stop tick-borne diseases before they spread widely. This protects both domestic herds and prevents economic losses from trade restrictions.
Eliminating ticks allows farmers to transport and sell cattle without quarantine restrictions. This increases market access and economic opportunities for producers.
Program enhancement likely requires taxpayer funding for ongoing operations. Budget allocation raises questions about fiscal priorities during tight government budgets.
Tick eradication across large border areas is difficult and expensive. Success depends on consistent coordination with Mexico and private landowner cooperation.
Expanded programs may require pesticide treatments affecting the environment or animal welfare. Long-term ecological impacts of intensive tick control remain uncertain.
Coordinating between federal, state, and private stakeholders requires significant administrative effort. Delays or miscommunication could reduce program effectiveness.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10157
Freedom to Home Distill Act
S 5301
Voice for Farm Workers Act
S 5303
Supporting Our Farm and Food System Workforce Act
HR 10058
Summer Meals and Learning Act of 2026
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.