Latest action: Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 24 - 16.
Committee has approved the bill (usually with amendments) and sent it back to the full chamber.
The committee voted to send the bill to the floor of the full chamber. The Speaker of the House schedules a floor vote.
Next: Passed One Chamber
The other chamber (Senate or House) repeats the committee + floor-vote process
Updates IRS staffing and modernizes tax agency operations and technology systems.
The problem
The IRS faces aging technology systems, staffing shortages, and difficulty processing tax returns. These issues cause delays for taxpayers and reduce revenue collection efficiency.
The proposal
The bill authorizes funding for IRS workforce expansion, equipment upgrades, and modernization of computer systems. It aims to improve tax processing speed and customer service.
The impact
Taxpayers may experience faster processing. Businesses filing taxes could see quicker responses. IRS employees gain resources. Taxpayers may pay higher costs through government spending.
Upgraded technology and more staff could mean tax returns get processed quicker. Taxpayers might receive refunds sooner. Businesses could get answers to questions faster.
More IRS workers means shorter wait times on the phone. Taxpayers get help when they call with questions. Service quality improves overall.
Better systems help catch errors and unpaid taxes. Government collects more revenue without raising tax rates. This money funds other government services.
Modern computers and trained staff make fewer mistakes. Taxpayers face fewer incorrect bills or penalties. Disputes with the IRS decrease.
The bill costs money to implement. Taxpayers ultimately pay through taxes. This increases the national budget deficit.
New computer systems handle sensitive personal information. Data breaches could expose social security numbers and financial details. Security upgrades must be strong.
Large technology projects often face delays and cost overruns. The IRS might struggle to use new systems effectively. Results may take years to appear.
Automation could reduce the number of IRS jobs needed in some areas. Workers in certain positions might face layoffs. Retraining costs may be required.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10730
Healthy Communities Act of 2026
HR 5349
TAS Act
HR 9496
End Tax Penalties on American Hostages Act
HR 997
National Taxpayer Advocate Enhancement Act of 2025
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
No donor data found for current cycle
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.