Latest action: Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committees on the Judiciary, Financial Services, Ways and Means, Oversight and Government Reform, Energy and Commerce, and Rules, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill strengthens U.S. responses to Russia through sanctions, military support, and financial measures.
The problem
Russia's actions are seen as threatening U.S. interests and allied nations. The bill aims to increase American leverage and deterrence against Russian aggression.
The proposal
The bill likely authorizes sanctions, increases military aid to allies, restricts financial transactions with Russia, and strengthens coordinated international responses to Russian activities.
The impact
Affects U.S. foreign policy toward Russia, American businesses with Russian dealings, allied nations receiving support, and Russian entities subject to sanctions.
Coordinated sanctions and military support may discourage Russian aggression against neighboring countries. Allies gain clearer security commitments from the United States.
The bill promotes coordinated action with NATO and other partners. This creates stronger international pressure and consistency in dealing with Russia.
Military aid to allies provides defensive capabilities for countries near Russian borders. This addresses legitimate security concerns of Eastern European nations.
Establishes explicit congressional intent on Russia policy. Provides consistency regardless of administration changes.
Sanctions restrict American companies from trading with Russia and related entities. Some U.S. industries may lose market access and revenue.
Strong sanctions and military aid could provoke Russian retaliation or escalate tensions. This might increase global instability and conflict risk.
Aggressive measures may reduce opportunities for negotiation and diplomatic solutions. Hard-line approaches can entrench positions on both sides.
Some countries may not support strict sanctions or military aid. Uneven compliance reduces the bill's effectiveness.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10748
Balkans Security Cooperation Act
SRES 939
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate that it values the active participation of the Republic of Kosovo as the state partner of the Iowa National Guard over the past 15 years.
HR 1744
United States Commission on International Religious Freedom Reauthorization Act of 2026
HCONRES 89
Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.