Latest action: Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 30 - 24.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Filed in the House.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Removes rules requiring companies to report their conflict mineral sourcing.
The problem
Current Securities Exchange Act requires companies to disclose conflict minerals in supply chains. Some argue this creates compliance burdens and paperwork costs for businesses.
The proposal
Repeals SEC disclosure requirements for conflict minerals from the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
The impact
Affects large public companies, investors, supply chain transparency advocates, and conflict mineral-affected regions in central Africa.
Companies spend significant resources auditing supply chains and filing reports. Removing this requirement cuts administrative and compliance expenses. Businesses can redirect resources to other priorities.
Public companies face complex, detailed disclosure rules. Repealing this requirement streamlines SEC filings. Companies have fewer forms to complete.
Fewer regulations may help U.S. companies compete internationally. Other countries have less stringent reporting rules. This could level the playing field.
Investors currently use conflict mineral reports to assess corporate ethics and supply chain risks. Removing disclosures means investors have less information to make decisions. This weakens market transparency.
Disclosure rules aimed to reduce funding for armed groups in Central Africa. Removing requirements removes pressure on companies to source responsibly. This could indirectly support conflict financing.
Companies lose incentive to audit their supply chains for ethical sourcing. Consumers and advocacy groups lose visibility into business practices. Corporate accountability for sourcing decreases.
Supply chain scrutiny encouraged responsible mining practices in conflict regions. Without disclosure requirements, economic pressure to improve conditions decreases. Communities in mineral-rich areas may see fewer positive changes.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
S 5639
Portal for Appraisal Licensing Act of 2026
S 1564
Floodplain Enhancement and Recovery Act
HR 1190
Expanding Access to Capital for Rural Job Creators Act
HR 7730
Bankruptcy Threshold Adjustment Act
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.