Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Filed in the House.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Proposes tax changes to encourage businesses to keep jobs in California instead of moving elsewhere.
The problem
Some California businesses relocate to other states for tax or regulatory reasons, reducing employment and tax revenue in the state.
The proposal
Bill likely creates tax incentives or penalties related to job location decisions, though specific details unavailable without full text.
The impact
California businesses, workers, and state government would be affected through changes to tax obligations and employment incentives.
Could encourage companies to maintain operations and employment in California rather than relocating. This would preserve existing jobs and the skills associated with established workforces. Local communities could maintain economic stability.
Keeping businesses in-state means more payroll and business taxes collected by California. This increases funding available for state services and infrastructure. Higher tax revenue reduces pressure on the state budget.
Employees benefit from job security when companies stay in California. Workers avoid forced relocation or job loss. Local economies benefit from stable employment.
Retained businesses support local suppliers, services, and related industries. Communities maintain their economic base and tax-supported services. Schools and infrastructure remain adequately funded.
Tax penalties on relocation could make California businesses less competitive against out-of-state competitors. Companies might struggle if other states offer better business conditions. This could ultimately harm remaining California businesses.
Tax incentives require funding, typically from other taxpayers or reduced services. These costs must come from somewhere in the state budget. The net economic benefit is uncertain.
Restrictions on business location choices limit corporate autonomy and free market operations. Companies should be able to make decisions based on their needs. Policies that constrain business decisions raise rights concerns.
Tracking which jobs are created or moved requires administrative resources and enforcement. Businesses might find loopholes or creative workarounds. Implementation costs and effectiveness are unclear.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10730
Healthy Communities Act of 2026
HR 5349
TAS Act
HR 9496
End Tax Penalties on American Hostages Act
HR 997
National Taxpayer Advocate Enhancement Act of 2025
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.