Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Filed in the Senate.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Limits foreign nationals' ability to sue in U.S. courts.
The problem
Foreign individuals may abuse American court systems by filing lawsuits they couldn't file in their own countries, costing U.S. courts time and money.
The proposal
This bill restricts when foreign nationals can sue in U.S. courts, requiring stronger connections to America before allowing cases to proceed.
The impact
Foreign plaintiffs face higher barriers to suing in U.S. courts. U.S. courts may have fewer cases. American defendants gain some protection.
Blocking foreign nationals from filing weak cases could save U.S. courts time and resources. Courts could focus on cases involving actual connections to America. This improves court efficiency.
U.S. companies facing lawsuits from foreign individuals with little connection to America could be shielded. This reduces legal costs and uncertainty for American businesses.
The bill ensures American courts handle cases properly connected to America. Foreign courts should handle cases about foreign people and foreign activities.
Foreign victims genuinely harmed by American companies or products may lose the right to sue in U.S. courts. People injured by American manufacturers abroad could be unable to get justice.
Some foreign nationals with real cases may have no other place to sue if their home courts are corrupted or unfair. This limits justice options for vulnerable people.
The bill doesn't clearly define what counts as 'abuse' of courts. Judges may disagree on which cases are legitimate, creating confusion and inconsistent rulings.
Other countries might view this as America closing its courts to foreigners. This could damage America's image as a fair and open legal system.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10764
Executive Settlement Review Act
HR 8352
Criminal History Access Act of 2026
S 32
LACA
HR 10389
Survivor’s Voice Protection Act
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.