Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Filed in the Senate.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Creates ethics and investigative offices within the Supreme Court.
The problem
The Supreme Court lacks internal ethics enforcement mechanisms and investigative bodies to handle ethical violations or misconduct by justices.
The proposal
Establishes an Office of Ethics Counsel and an Office of Investigative Counsel within the Supreme Court to oversee ethical compliance and investigate potential violations.
The impact
Affects Supreme Court justices, staff, and public confidence in the Court's integrity. Changes how ethics complaints are handled internally.
Creates formal mechanisms for the Supreme Court to address ethical concerns internally. This could improve public trust by showing the Court takes misconduct seriously.
Establishes dedicated ethics expertise within the Court. Similar offices exist in lower courts and other government branches, standardizing oversight across the judiciary.
Dedicated investigative staff could provide consistent, professional handling of ethics complaints. Reduces appearance of the Court policing itself informally.
Formal ethics structures may rebuild public faith in the Court's impartiality and integrity. Addresses concerns about accountability at the highest judicial level.
Adding internal oversight offices could be seen as limiting justices' independence. Creates potential friction between ethics functions and judicial autonomy.
New offices require funding, staff, and administrative resources. Budget implications for expanding the Court's bureaucracy.
Internal offices answer to the Court itself, raising questions about true independence. Investigating justices while remaining part of the same institution creates inherent conflicts.
Bill does not specify investigation scope, enforcement powers, or what happens after investigations conclude. Raises questions about actual effectiveness.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10764
Executive Settlement Review Act
HR 8352
Criminal History Access Act of 2026
S 32
LACA
HR 10389
Survivor’s Voice Protection Act
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.