Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Filed in the Senate.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Bill gives states more power to set their own consumer financial protection rules.
The problem
Federal financial regulations may not fit all states' needs. States want more control over consumer protection policies affecting their residents.
The proposal
Allows states to create their own consumer financial protection standards instead of only following federal rules set by agencies like the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
The impact
States, banks, and consumers experience changes. Banks must follow different rules by state. States gain regulatory power. Consumers may get different protections depending where they live.
Different states have different economies and consumer needs. Giving states power lets them create rules that work best for their communities instead of one-size-fits-all federal rules.
Banks may spend less money complying with overlapping federal and state rules. Clearer state-level authority could simplify compliance costs for financial institutions.
States gain power to protect their own residents through regulation. This aligns with federalism principles that give states responsibility for many consumer protection matters.
States can experiment with new consumer protection approaches. Successful state policies can serve as models for other states or federal government.
Banks and financial companies operating across states must follow 50 different sets of rules. This increases complexity and costs, especially for smaller institutions and consumers.
Some states might set lower protection standards to attract banks. Consumers in those states could lose important safeguards against fraud, unfair practices, and financial harm.
Federal agencies like the CFPB provide consistent monitoring for predatory lending and scams. Shifting power to states removes national-level protections and oversight.
States with weak rules attract financial companies while strict-rule states lose them. This can create a race-to-the-bottom where states compete by lowering protections.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
S 5639
Portal for Appraisal Licensing Act of 2026
S 1564
Floodplain Enhancement and Recovery Act
HR 1190
Expanding Access to Capital for Rural Job Creators Act
HR 7730
Bankruptcy Threshold Adjustment Act
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.