Latest action: Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committees on Armed Services, Energy and Commerce, Financial Services, and Science, Space, and Technology, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Filed in the House.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
The 123 GO Act addresses international affairs coordination across multiple federal agencies.
The problem
No official summary available. Bill title and referral suggest coordination challenges between State Department, Defense, Energy, Commerce, and science agencies on international matters.
The proposal
Bill referred to five House committees including Foreign Affairs, Armed Services, Energy and Commerce, Financial Services, and Science, Space, and Technology for review of relevant provisions.
The impact
Federal agencies, international partners, and domestic industries may be affected by coordinated international policy changes across defense, energy, trade, and technology sectors.
Bringing multiple agencies together can reduce conflicts between different government departments. This could make U.S. international policy more consistent and effective.
Multiple committee review ensures different perspectives on international issues. This thorough process can catch problems before implementation.
Including science and technology committees suggests focus on modern international challenges like cyber threats and innovation competition.
Requiring five committees to review creates delays in responding to urgent international situations. Quick action may be needed on time-sensitive foreign policy matters.
No official summary exists, making it impossible to assess actual proposals or costs. Voters and Congress members lack information about specific changes.
Multiple committees reviewing the same bill could create conflicting requirements. This complexity might confuse implementation across agencies.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10748
Balkans Security Cooperation Act
SRES 939
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate that it values the active participation of the Republic of Kosovo as the state partner of the Iowa National Guard over the past 15 years.
HR 1744
United States Commission on International Religious Freedom Reauthorization Act of 2026
HCONRES 89
Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.