Latest action: Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 95.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Filed in the Senate.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Bill authorizes partnerships between the U.S. and ASEAN, CERN, and the Pacific Islands Forum.
The problem
The U.S. needs to strengthen diplomatic and cooperative relationships with key international organizations and regions to maintain global influence and address shared challenges.
The proposal
The bill establishes formal partnership frameworks with ASEAN, CERN, and the Pacific Islands Forum to coordinate on policy, research, and strategic interests.
The impact
U.S. government, international organizations, scientists, and Pacific island nations affected through new diplomatic channels, research collaboration, and strategic alignment.
Building formal relationships with ASEAN, CERN, and PIF increases U.S. diplomatic influence in key regions. These partnerships can help address shared challenges like climate change, scientific research, and regional stability.
Partnership with CERN opens doors for American scientists to collaborate on cutting-edge research and access advanced facilities. This can lead to technological breakthroughs and educational opportunities.
Formal partnership with Pacific Islands Forum strengthens relationships with vulnerable island nations facing climate change and economic challenges. This demonstrates U.S. commitment to the region.
Closer ties with ASEAN and other partners can expand trade relationships and investment opportunities for American businesses in growing markets.
Establishing new partnerships requires government funding for staffing, coordination, and initiatives. The bill does not specify budget allocations, which could strain existing resources.
Strengthening ties with certain international organizations may create tensions with other global powers who view these regions as important to their own interests.
The bill lacks specific details about how partnerships will work, what commitments are expected, or how success will be measured, making oversight difficult.
Critics may argue that resources spent on international partnerships should instead address domestic needs like infrastructure, healthcare, or education.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10748
Balkans Security Cooperation Act
SRES 939
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate that it values the active participation of the Republic of Kosovo as the state partner of the Iowa National Guard over the past 15 years.
HR 1744
United States Commission on International Religious Freedom Reauthorization Act of 2026
HCONRES 89
Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.