Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Filed in the Senate.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Bill establishes data protection standards for insurance companies handling customer information.
The problem
Insurance companies collect sensitive personal and financial data. Breaches could expose millions of customers to identity theft and fraud. Current protections vary widely across states.
The proposal
Creates federal data security requirements for insurers. Sets standards for data collection, storage, and breach notification. Establishes penalties for companies violating protection rules.
The impact
Insurance companies must upgrade security systems. Customers gain stronger privacy protections. Insurers may face compliance costs passed to consumers.
Customers' personal information gets stronger security standards. Clear rules make it harder for hackers to access sensitive data. Breach notification requirements mean people learn faster if their data is stolen.
Instead of different rules in each state, insurers follow one federal standard. This simplifies compliance for companies operating nationwide. It prevents weaker states from becoming security weak spots.
Stricter data protection makes it harder for criminals to steal identities. Faster breach notifications let people take action quickly. This saves individuals from fraud costs and credit damage.
Clear penalties give regulators power to punish companies that ignore rules. This incentivizes insurers to invest in real security. Enforcement creates consequences for negligence.
Insurance companies spend money upgrading security systems. They may raise premiums to cover these costs. Consumers could pay more for insurance as a result.
Smaller insurance companies spend more per dollar complying with new rules. Large companies absorb costs more easily. This could force small competitors out of business.
Federal data protection rules may conflict with existing state laws. Companies must navigate overlapping requirements. Confusion could delay compliance and create legal uncertainty.
Strict rules could discourage new insurance technologies and services. Companies might avoid new data uses to stay compliant. This could slow industry modernization and customer benefits.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
S 5639
Portal for Appraisal Licensing Act of 2026
S 1564
Floodplain Enhancement and Recovery Act
HR 1190
Expanding Access to Capital for Rural Job Creators Act
HR 7730
Bankruptcy Threshold Adjustment Act
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.