Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Creates a U.S.-Israel partnership for technology research and security cooperation.
The problem
The U.S. and Israel seek to strengthen their technological and security partnership through formal frameworks for joint research and development collaboration.
The proposal
Establishes the FUTURES Act to facilitate upgraded technology partnerships, unified research initiatives, and enhanced security cooperation between the United States and Israel.
The impact
Affects U.S.-Israel relations, technology companies, defense contractors, researchers, and government agencies involved in international technology and security partnerships.
Creates formal framework for U.S.-Israel cooperation on security threats and defense innovation. Leverages both nations' technological expertise to address shared challenges like cybersecurity and terrorism. May enhance mutual defense capabilities.
Joint research initiatives can accelerate development in advanced technologies. Both nations have strong tech sectors that could benefit from collaboration. May lead to breakthroughs in artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, and other fields.
Formal technology partnership strengthens U.S.-Israel relationship on practical level. Creates ongoing institutional cooperation beyond political changes. Demonstrates commitment to long-term alliance.
Joint technology projects could create jobs in both nations. Research partnerships might attract investment and private sector participation. May expand tech industry opportunities.
Formalized U.S.-Israel tech partnership could concern Arab nations and other Middle East countries. May be seen as taking sides in regional disputes. Could complicate diplomatic relationships with other allies.
Bill provides no details on how programs will be funded or total costs to U.S. taxpayers. Joint research initiatives require significant investment. Budget impact on other programs remains unknown.
Bill summary does not specify which technologies or research areas are included. Unclear what security cooperation entails or how it operates. Voters and Congress lack specifics on outcomes.
Joint research raises questions about intellectual property and technology sharing. May create concerns about classified information handling. Could impact U.S. companies competing in global markets.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10748
Balkans Security Cooperation Act
SRES 939
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate that it values the active participation of the Republic of Kosovo as the state partner of the Iowa National Guard over the past 15 years.
HR 1744
United States Commission on International Religious Freedom Reauthorization Act of 2026
HCONRES 89
Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.