Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Filed in the Senate.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Congress votes to block a rule requiring large banks to manage climate-related financial risks.
The problem
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency rescinded climate risk management principles for large financial institutions, creating disagreement over whether banks should account for climate-related financial dangers.
The proposal
This joint resolution uses congressional disapproval to reject the OCC's rescission, seeking to restore requirements for large banks to evaluate climate-related financial risks.
The impact
Large financial institutions, investors, and businesses would face requirements to assess how climate change affects their finances and operations. Consumers and taxpayers could be affected based on bank stability.
Requiring banks to assess climate risks helps prevent future financial crises. Banks would identify and manage dangers from extreme weather, environmental damage, and climate-related losses before they cause collapse.
Climate risk information allows investors and customers to understand true risks in financial institutions. Better information helps people and companies make smarter choices about where to place their money.
Banks would need to track how their lending and investments affect climate and environment. This encourages financial support for cleaner energy and reduces funding for high-pollution activities.
Many countries and global financial bodies already require climate risk assessment. U.S. banks would follow similar practices as international competitors.
Banks must spend money developing systems to measure and report climate risks. These costs could increase fees customers pay or reduce bank profits and shareholder returns.
Banks worried about climate risks might lend less to industries like energy, farming, or construction. Businesses in these sectors could face higher borrowing costs or fewer loan options.
The rule increases federal oversight of bank decisions and operations. Critics argue this gives government too much control over private business strategy and investment choices.
Banks must develop new measurement methods for climate risks that are hard to predict. Creating consistent, accurate standards across the industry is technically difficult and expensive.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
S 5639
Portal for Appraisal Licensing Act of 2026
S 1564
Floodplain Enhancement and Recovery Act
HR 1190
Expanding Access to Capital for Rural Job Creators Act
HR 7730
Bankruptcy Threshold Adjustment Act
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.